Macaraeg v. E Care Contact Centers Ltd. Overtime
Western Star "Employment Law Claims"
Western Star "Pension Law Claims"
|
|
REQUEST FOR ADDRESS INFORMATION (November 24, 2009)
The actuaries conducting the distribution of the Western Star Pension Class Action settlement require additional information to locate those who are or may be entitled to receive a portion of the settlement funds.
The first distribution has been made, but a number of cheques have not been delivered or cashed, presumably due to incorrect address information.
The list of persons who were to receive cheques, but for whom correct addresses are required can be viewed by clicking the link below:
- Recipients of First Distribution - Missing Address List.
Also, there is a large group of people potentially entitled to receive apart of the second distribution, for whom address information and proof of BC residency during the relevant time is required. The list of persons for whom additional addresses are required, and who MAY be entitled to a distribution can be viewed by clicking
- Potential Recipients of Second Distribution - Missing Address List.
YOUR HELP IS REQUESTED. Please click both links above and send current contact information for any of the persons on the list to
Rose Wong
Demner Consulting Services Ltd.
280 – 2025 West 42nd Avenue
Vancouver, B.C.
V6M 2B2
Phone: 604-266-2445
Fax: 604-266-1530
Email: wst@demner.com
First Distribution Update (September 24, 2009)
We are working with John Christie and Michael Demner, consulting actuaries, who have studied records available from various sources and have determined the appropriate step to take for the first distribution of settlement funds.
We are pleased to announce that the first distribution of the settlement proceeds is now under way. The highlights of the findings of the actuaries are:
-
The “master list” of persons who at any time had an interest in the Western Star Non-Bargaining Pension fund contains 742 names of persons who might be eligible for a distribution
164 former members were eliminated from possible distribution because they and their beneficiaries had no interest in the pension fund as at October 1, 2001, and thus were precluded from sharing
230 beneficiaries will receive cheques in the first distribution, as they are clearly entitled to share and current addresses are available (these persons were still pension fund beneficiaries as at October 2, 2001, and at the relevant class proceeding “residency period” (January 12, 2005 to May 19, 2005) they were BC residents, or they properly opted into the class proceeding)
There are 302 persons who will not receive cheques in the first distribution but might receive cheques in the second distribution. Of this group, 165 persons currently reside in BC and 137 persons currently reside outside BC. To receive a distribution, each of these beneficiaries will need to demonstrate residency in BC during the “residency period”.
Approximately $3,000,000 is being distributed in the first distribution
Approximately $1,300,000 is being held back for the second distribution and for the expenses of distribution
The first cheques will be mailed to the beneficiaries by the end of September, 2009.
We expect the second distribution will be in the first half of 2010.
Each of the 302 possible beneficiaries requiring further investigation will be receiving a letter asking for further information. Some of the addresses that we have in our records may be incorrect. If you believe that you may be entitled to share in the distribution and you do not receive a letter by October 17, 2009, please contact:
Rose Wong
Demner Consulting Services Ltd.
280 – 2025 West 42nd Avenue
Vancouver, B.C.
V6M 2B2
Phone: 604-266-2445
Fax: 604-266-1530
Email: wst@demner.com
The $3 million distributed in the first distribution has been divided among the beneficiaries in accordance with the Court Order approving the settlement. For beneficiaries who had not started to receive their pensions, a beneficiary who had long service with Western Star Trucks and was close to retirement will receive a larger distribution than a beneficiary who had shorter service and was further from retirement. For beneficiaries who had started to receive pensions, a beneficiary with a larger pension who was still relatively young will receive a larger distribution than a beneficiary with a smaller pension who was older.
The $1.3 million has been held back from the first distribution in order to provide sufficient funds to pay the second distribution to beneficiaries who require further investigation and to pay the future expenses of administering the settlement. The beneficiaries who have received cheques in the first distribution may be eligible for another cheque in the second distribution, depending on the results of these further investigations.
You can find here a list of potential beneficiaries for whom we do not have a current address. We will be updating this list from time to time as we may discover other invalid addresses. If you see your name on this list or know the current address of someone on the list, please contact Rose Wong using the contact information above.
NOTE: If you cannot open the links, you may need a copy of the free Adobe Reader which you can find here.
Distribution Update (August 2009)
The actuaries appointed by TevlinGleadle (John Christie, Michael Demner) are close to making the first distribution of settlement funds.
We are working with the actuaries and class representative Mr. Peter Gregg to update available information about current addresses, residency at the date of the Certification Order, and expect to be able to authorize release of settlement funds in the next several weeks.
The distribution will occur in phases.
Stage one will be letters to those who are clearly entitled to share in the distribution, and for whom we have current beneficiary information. At this stage, we will also write letters to class members who are beneficiaries, but for whom current address and survivor information is unclear, seeking additional information, to permit delivery of the first distribution amounts. We will complete the first stage by distributing to all those for whom information is available and entitlement is clear. We intend to hold back sufficient funds to ensure that proper distribution occurs to those entitled to share in the net settlement amount. There will be a period of time between the first distribution and the second distribution to permit necessary information to be gathered.
Stage two will involve a distribution of remaining funds to all those entitled to share. It will in all probability be a much smaller distribution that in stage one.
We will continue to work to complete the distribution in accordance with the terms of settlement and the order confirming the settlement.
Distribution Update (Spring 2009)
Work is underway leading to the eventual distribution of settlement funds.
In late-November, 2008, TevlinGleadle appointed Canadian Western Bank ("CWB") to act as trustee of the funds payable by Freightliner pursuant to the settlement.
Freightliner paid the settlement funds to CWB in early December, 2008.
TevlinGleadle has appointed Christie Consulting, a firm of consulting actuaries located in Vancouver, BC to complete the work necessary to distribute funds to those class members who are entitled to share in the settlement.
We have been working since early December with Mr. John Christie, of Christie Consulting, in an effort to obtain necessary factual information from Freightliner and its actuaries, Towers Perrin. Freightliner and its actuaries have considerable information as to pensioner's service and earning histories, relevant personal circumstances, addresses, and past distributions, all of which is required to complete the distribution.
This is not a trivial exercise, in that access is required to information that is held by Freightliner and its actuaries, and must first be obtained and then organized, and analyzed, before individual entitlement can be determined.
We have encountered some challenges in obtaining necessary information but are working steadily toward the eventual goal, which will be a distibution.
It will be at least a number of months before distributions occur. No estimated distribution date is presently known.
Those interested in further information should check here for additional updates.
All persons who think they are entitled to share in the distribution should ensure TevlinGleadle has current contact information by emailing Rose Wong at Demner Constulting wst@demner.com.
|
Settlement Approved
TevlinGleadle is very pleased to announce that on October 31, 2008, Murray Tevlin and Dan Gleadle appeared before Madam Justice Ballance of the BC Supreme Court and the Court approved the settlement in the terms proposed. The Court approved the overall $5.75 million dollar settlement amount, the legal fees of class counsel calculated at 20% of the amount recovered, a proposed fee to Mr. Gregg for his hundreds of hours work advancing the claim on behalf of the class, and the method of distribution of the net amount recovered to the class members.
Now that the settlement is approved, certain further work remains to be done to complete the settlement.
Firstly, we will work with defence counsel and the Court to have the formal court orderer entered as an order of the Supreme Court of British Columbia. This work is now underway.
The court ordered that the defendants pay the settlement amount to a Trust Company nominated by Class Counsel, by December 1, 2008. We are in the process of identifying a suitable Trust Company to receive and disburse settlement funds.
Once settlement funds are in the hands of the Trust Company, a portion of the funds will be used to pay legal fees and the fee to Mr. Gregg, and a portion of the remaining funds will be reserved to pay the costs of distribution, indluding actuarial costs to determine individual entitlement.
Plaintiff's counsel has engaged the services of an actuary, Mr. John Christie, who will do the work needed to determine the actual entitlement of individual class members based on actuarial principles. This work will involve liaising with Freightliner's Counsel and its actuaries to obtain information about the pension rights of individuals.
Until the actuary, Mr. Christie, has obtain necessary information and completed required calculations, we do not know the full details of which persons will share, nor the actual amount to be distributed to each person.
Monies to be distributed to class members will be treated as taxable income, and before any payments can occur, it will be necessary for class counsel and counsel for Freightliner to agree on the required "withholding". Monies withheld in this manner will be remitted by the Trust Company to Canada Revenue Agency("CRA") for each recipient, to the tax account for that recipient, at an appropriate rate. It may be necessary to obtain a pre-clearance from CRA for the appropriate withholding percentages. Monies withheld in this manner may or may not be recoverable by individual recipients when they file their individual tax returns. Each recipient of monies should obtain tax advice from their financial advisors as to the tax treatment of monies withheld from the districtuion. It is expected that when monies are distributed, T slips will also be delivered.
It is important that we have on hand up-to-date contact information for everyone who believes that he or she may be entitled to share in the distribution. Current information should be sent to TevlinGleadle by email at the email address ktorgerson@tevlingleadle.com.
Distribution of entitlement of the monies recovered in this pension class action will not be handled by Freightliner, but instead by the Trust Company nominated by TevlinGleadle, upon instructions from TevlinGleadle.
A copy of the Order approving the settlement can be found here.
NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT AND PROPOSED DISTRIBUTION
On September 11, 2008, Dan Gleadle and Murray Tevlin appeared before Madam Justice Ballance of the BC Supreme Court to inform the Court of the settlement and to obtain directions for a process to obtain formal court approval.
The Class Proceedings Act requires court approval as to the overall $5.75 million dollar settlement with the defendants, the legal fees of class counsel calculated at 20% of the amount recovered, a proposed fee to Mr. Gregg for his hundreds of hours work advancing the claim on behalf of the class, and the method of distribution of the net amount recovered to the class members.
The Judge, having read the extensive material which we had provided the Court, heard submissions from counsel and indicated that before final approval was given, notice of the proposed plan for distribution should be provided to class members.
Class Counsel intend to give notice to class members via publication on the TevlinGleadle website, word-of-mouth initiated by representative plaintiffs, and by emails to class members outside British Columbia where email addresses are available.
The Court directed that a date be set for a subsequent court hearing for final approval. That date will be October 31, 2008. Any class member is entitled to attend at the court hearing to provide their views to the Court, or to engage their own legal counsel to represent them to advance their particular views in Court.
Proposed Distribution of Settlement Funds
At the hearing at 9:00 AM on October 31, 2008 we will seek approval of our recommended settlement terms.
1. Who Will Share? Class Counsel will propose that the net settlement amount be distributed only to persons who:
a. are members of the Western Star pension class proceeding, and
b. were, as at October 1, 2001, members of the Western Star Pension Plan or its predecessor pension plans (either pensioners, deferred vested pension plan members, or active employees with accrued pension benefits).
If you have a question about whether you are a member of the Western Star pension class proceeding, please see the definition of the Class in the Certification Order dated January 12, 2005.
For all purposes relating to distribution, individuals will be considered to have ceased to be members of the Western Star Pension Plan or its predecessor plans if, on or before September 30, 2001, they had elected to receive their interest in the pension plan by way of a commuted value payment or otherwise settled their pension entitlement and terminated membership in the Plan prior to that date.
Estates of such members who have passed away since October 1, 2001 will also be entitled to benefit.
2. Who Will Not Share? No distribution will be made to any person who is not a member of the Western Star pension class proceeding. In addition, we will propose that no distribution be made to any person who ceased to have an interest in the pension plan on or before September 30, 2001. In particular, those persons who had at some time been members of the Western Star Pension Plan, or it predecessor plans but who had, on or before September 30, 2001, elected to receive the commuted value of their pension plan benefit, or otherwise settled their pension entitlement and terminated membership in the Plan prior to that date, will not share.
The actual wind-up of the pension plan proceeded on a cut-off date of January 1, 2000. However, it is proposed that the cut-off date for purposes of sharing in the distribution of the amount recovered in this class proceeding will be October 1, 2001.
3. Why Choose the October 1, 2001 cut-off date? The claim in this case was in the nature of a claim to surplus existing in the plan at the time of termination, both actual surplus as well as any notional surplus which may have been created if the plaintiffs had succeeded in establishing liability on the part of the defendants for alleged misconduct in the administration of the Western Star Pension Plan.
Because a right to surplus only comes into existence at the time of termination, it is our view that the only persons with an interest in the claim are those persons who had an interest in the plan at the time of wind-up, the effective date of which was September 30, 2002. The cut-off date of October 1, 2001 will ensure that all individuals in this group will share in the settlement.
The October 1, 2001 cut-off date also has the effect of including those persons who elected to terminate their interest in the pension plan (including any surplus in the plan) after Freightliner’s decision to close the plant which was announced in October 2001. The logic of this extension is that once Freightliner made the decision to close the plant and announced it, all employee terminations and pension elections are properly considered part of the process of plant closure and wind up.
Employees who were terminated prior to learning of the decision to close the plant, (that is on or before September 30, 2001), and who chose to take their money out of the pension plan elected to terminate their interest in the plan, including any interest in a potential surplus, for reasons unrelated to the closure of the plan and wind up of the plan and cannot be considered to be persons who had a continuing interest in the plan at wind up.
This approach finds clear support in the leading Canadian text “Pension Law” by Ari Kaplan at page 581:
"Consent will also not be required from so-called “past members” of the plan, that is, employees who used to participate in the plan but on termination of employment and plan membership, elected a portability option and transferred the commuted value of their pension entitlement to a locked-in retirement savings vehicle. Such persons have no legal claim to any of the surplus assets in the plan; since they “were not at risk over the years as to the performance of the Plan and they should not now, and latterly, be able to come along and insist on receiving a portion of the benefit which the plan has generated”
(quote taken from C.F. Kingsway case).
4. What Distribution Formula will the Court be asked to approve? The court will be asked to approve a process for distribution. We will ask the court to approve, firstly, the cut-off date for inclusion or exclusion of class members, and then secondly, a formula for calculating what each individual will get which will be recommended by an actuary.
The formula will be based on the actual amounts received by plan members in the actual plan windup in respect of their defined benefit pensions.
For example, if, in the actual plan windup, plan member A received an amount of $10,000 either as a cash refund, transfer to an RRSP or the purchase of an annuity and the total windup amount for all members who are eligible to share in this distribution was $20 million, the plan member’s share of the total windup liability was 0.05% of the total. Plan member A will now receive 0.05% of the total net amount available for distribution as a result of this settlement. Therefore, if the amount available for distribution in the class proceeding is $4.5 million (after legal and actuarial costs) A would receive a.05% of $4.5 million or about $2,250 less any withholding taxes or other deductions required by law.
5. What Specific Amount Will Individuals Receive? This will not be known until after the Court approves the overall settlement amount, the legal fees, Mr. Gregg’s fee, the cut-off date (i.e. who will share?) and the actuary gathers needed information and calculates individual entitlement. Because of the need to gather precise information about each member who will share in the distribution, we expect that it will take some time after the Court approval before the amounts to be distributed to each individual are calculated.
6. Is it anticipated that any further Court Approval would be required prior to Distribution? No. It is anticipated that class counsel and the actuary, in co-operation with defence counsel, will take all steps necessary to complete distribution to individuals.
7. How will the actual distribution take place? It is expected that the agreed amount of the settlement will be held in trust pending completion of the settlement. After the actuary has gathered all the precise data about each member entitled to benefit from the settlement and completed his calculations, he will advise class counsel of the amount to be distributed to each member. Cheques will be issued to each member upon the direction of class counsel in accordance in with the Court approved formula. In the event that monies payable to any particular person or estate are not claimed within 6 months of the date of attempted first distribution, such monies will be distributed to those other persons who have received funds, proportionately, but no distribution of unclaimed money will be made if the recipient would receive less than $100. The balance of unclaimed and undistributed money will be paid to the United Way of the Central & South Okanagan/Similkameen.
8. What if you have questions, ideas or objections about the settlement or distribution? Firstly, each class member can contact Dan Gleadle or Murray Tevlin for further information or to discuss ideas or objections. Each class member is entitled to attend at the court hearing scheduled for October 31, 2008 to provide their views to the Court. Anyone can engage their own legal counsel to represent them to advance their particular views in Court.
9. What is the result of Settlement and Distribution once approved by the Court? Once approved, the settlement will be final and binding on all class members who did not opt out of the class pursuant to the terms of earlier orders of the Court. All claims by members of the class who have not opted out will be finally and absolutely extinguished and class members will be barred from bringing any further action against the defendants arising from or in connection with the WST Plan or any predecessor plans. This applies to all class members, whether or not they receive a share of the settlement.
|
|
Western Star Pension Class Action Settled
TevlinGleadle is pleased to announce that we have arrived at a settlement of the Pension Class Action, subject to approval by the British Columbia Supreme Court. The parties have agreed to settle the case for a payment by the defendants in the total amount of $5.75 Million.
This settlement has been achieved by our firm working closely with Peter Gregg, George Schieven and other Class Representatives, and in co-operation with Freightliner and its counsel and with the Trust companies and their counsel. Successful negotiations occured after a lengthy and effective mediation process conducted by Don Munroe Q.C.
We are now working hard toward a recommendation for Court approval of a method of distributing the money to the appropriate pensioner class member. We must present a brief of law to the Court and ensure that the correct amounts are paid to the legally appropriate class members, as soon as practicable.
When we are in a position to recommend the distribution, we will publish our recommendation here.

A copy of the Settlement Agreement can be found here.
Historical Developments (Chronology)
Action Commenced
On April
16, 2002, TevlinGleadle commenced an action under the British
Columbia Class
Proceedings Act on behalf of Peter Gregg, a present Freightliner
employee, as a representative member of the class of non-unionized employees
of Freightliner's Western Star Truck plant in Kelowna, British Columbia.
Interested
parties can review:
On July 10, 2002 TevlinGleadle received notice that the Supreme Court
of British Columbia had appointed Madam Justice Bennett as the judge
who will be responsible for the trial of the action, as well as pre-trial
management matters, including the certification hearing and all other
motions in the case, unless otherwise ordered.
Certification Material Filed
On July 24th, 2002 TevlinGleadle filed
documents with the Supreme Court of British Columbia in support of
the plaintiff's application for certification. These documents can
be viewed by clicking the following links:
Peter Gregg's Notice
of Motion, dated July 24, 2002, a document setting out the orders
that will be sought at the certification hearing
Affidavit
of Dagmar Dlab, dated July 24, 2002 (with one exhibit only,a spreadsheet
showing preliminary information about historical financial transactions
involving the pension trust)
On September 13, 2002, TevlinGleadle
filed with the court a written submission with a summary of the case,
and reasons why, in the plaintiff's view, it would be appropriate for
this matter to continue as a class proceeding.
Our submission can be
found at:
Certification Hearing, October
15 - 17, 2002:
On Tuesday, October 15, 2002 TevlinGleadle
appeared again in the British Columbia Supreme Court before Madam
Justice Bennett, and presented submissions as to why the action commenced
in this proceeding should be certified as a class action:
Submissions were made by counsel for Freightliner and
the defendant Trust Companies, in opposition to the application for
certification.When submissions were concluded, Madam Justice Bennett
advised that she would take some time to consider her decision
.
Matter Certified as Class Proceeding - Severed from Employment Action
On Thursday, Febuary 13, 2003 the Honourable
Judge Elizabeth Bennett pronounced Reasons for Judgement certifying
the Western Star proceeding as a class action under the Class
Proceedings Act.As well, the judge ordered that the pension claims and
the employment claims be "severed". This required class
counsel to commence a separate action for the employment claims, and
as the two cases progress there will be separate notices to class
members, separate decisions required by class members regarding opting
into or out of each claim, and separate process as the two matters
move forward to a resolution.
Steps to Complete Certification
On June 30, 2003 with the assistance
of the Case Management Judge, a new hearing was scheduled for September
11, 2003. At that hearing, class counsel intended to seek to have
the court resolve all outstanding issues relating to certification
of the pension class action. These issues primariliy relate to the
appropriate subclasses for the pension class.The motion scheduled for September 11, 2003 was adjourned, and since then counsel for the class, Freightliner,
and the Trust Company have been in communication in an effort to resolve
the definition of the pension class, and certain related issues including
the creation of sub-classes to reflect differences amongst pensioners,
the steps needed, once certification is finalized, to notify persons
who are or might be class members, and the like.These steps are being taken in furtherance of a direction
of the class action judge, that the action will be certified as a
class action after suitable classes and subclasses are defined.Once the parties have agreed on suitable classes, subclasses,
and perhaps representative plaintiffs, the Writ of Summons and Statement
of Claim will be amended, and notices will be mailed to class members,
where addresses are available, and steps will be taken to publish
the relevant events via newspapers and this website.On January 5, 2005 counsel for all parties are scheduled
to appear before the Case Managemetn Judge to deal with outstanding
issues relating to the certification
of the proceeding as a class action. At the hearing, Class Counsel
will present a proposed Amended Writ of Summons and Further Amended
Statement of Claim which will add other persons as class representatives.
There will also be a discussion of the manner in which notice will
be given to the class members.
At the CMC
on January 12, 2005, Judge Bennett made the following
orders:
-
settled the terms of a formal Certification
Order which added six new plaintiffs to the proceeding,
to act as representatives plaintiffs on behalf of sub-classes
of pension claimants.
The representative plaintiffs are:
(a) George Schieven - Cockshutt Sub-Class & Non-Resident
Sub-Class
(b) Peter Woolley - White Trucks Sub-Class
(c) Peter Gregg - White Western Star Sub-Class
(d) John Langergraber - White Motor Sub-Class
(e) Terry Barker - WSTI Pre-1985 Sub-Class
(f) James Gilchrist - WSTI Post-1985 Sub-Class
-
-
gave directions as to the manner in which
the class action is to be advertised, to bring to the attention
of the potential class members their rights to opt in or
opt out of the proceeding.
Details of the required notice
procedure are contained in the Certification
Order.
By Mid-February, 2005 TevlinGleadle, class
counsel are to arrange for publication of notices of the certification
in certain newspapers mentioned in the Order. The required
language for the newspaper advertisement is available here.
By Mid-February, 2005, a mail out is to be
completed by Freightliner in the form of the Long
Form Notice, which gives added information about the class
action.
PROCEDURE TO OPT IN OR OPT OUT
Participation in the class action is not mandatory. By reading the definition of the class in the Certification
Order, all persons will be able to learn whether they are
or could be included in the class.
BRITISH COLUMBIA RESIDENTS
British Columbia residents who are within the definition
of the class are automatically participants in the class action
and need do nothing, unless they wish not to partipate, in which
case they must before May 15, 2005 fill in and deliver the Opt
Out Notice (a copy of which can be obtained by clicking the
link).
NON-BRITISH COLUMBIA RESIDENTS
Persons living outside British Columbia residents
who are within the definition of the class are not automatically
members of the class action. If such persons do not wish to participate
in the class action they need do nothing. If they wish to particiapate
in the class action they must before May 15, 2005 fill in and deliver
the Opt In Notice, a copy
of which can be obtained by clicking the link.The Opt In and Opt Out Notices are available in adobe.pdf
format, and if problems are encountered in downloading the forms,
you may need to obtain the free Adobe Reader program which is available
by clicking on the Get Acrobat Reader icon below.
Case Management Conference October 18, 2006
At the case management conference
Judge Bennett directed that:
-
the matter was to be set down for a 4 week trial of the common
isses
-
all parties were to complete electronic document exchange,
whereafter class counsel would prepare and circulate a proposed
agreed statement of facts and list of agreed documents for
use at trial.
Case Management Conference April
4, 2007
At that conference, the court directed that Plaintiff's
counsel is to finalize a proposed Agreed Book of Documents by May 4,
2007 and a proposed Agreed Statement of Facts by May 25th, 2007.
Another
Case Management Conference is to be held before June 8th. to discuss
cut off dates for futher matters such as examinations for discovery
and the like.
In the fall of 2006, the matter was scheduled
for a 4 week trial (of the common issues) commencing on April 14, 2008.
See Notice
of Trial
-
Case Management Conference June 5, 2007
The court directed that
the following be done in advance of the trial:
Plaintiff's counsel to finalize Index of joint document books and
provide to defence counsel as soon as practical
Plaintiff's counsel to provide list of potential Examination for
Discovery candidates by June 29th, 2007
Defendants to conduct an additional search for relevant documents,
to provide such documents to Plaintiff's counsel as located, and to
provide a Supplemental List of Documents by August 31, 2007. Index
to be updated with additional documents for joint boosk of documents
Defendants to answer Interrogatories (regarding expenses of trust
paid from pension fund, and extent of contributions to fund) by September
28, 2007
Examination for Discovery's to commence by Ocober. 15, 2007
New Judge Assigned
The Honourable Justice Sandra Ballance was assigned as the judge responsible for the action in place of Judge Bennett.
Frequently Asked
Questions - Pension Class Action
Am I a member of the Pension Class Action?
In the Statement of Claim, filed on behalf of the class
members, the persons included in the pension class are as described
follows:"All persons who are members or former members of the pension
plan for non-bargaining unit employees of Freightliner Canada, Western
Star Trucks division, their respective surviving spouses, former spouses,
designated beneficiaries, personal representatives, and all other persons
who are beneficiaries of the said pension plan.
At this point the court has not yet approved these classes. The court
may approve these classes, vary the classes or simply not approve the
classes. There will be a hearing in the Supreme Court of British Columbia
in Vancouver on this issue, and we are hopeful that we will get the
two classes approved as soon as possible."BC Residents: If you are a resident of British
Columbia, you will automatically be a member of the class by falling
within the definition outlined above. You do not have to do anything
to be part of the class. If you do not want to be part of the class,
you will have the opportunity to "opt out" at a later date,
after certification of the claim as a class action.Non-BC Residents: If you fall into the above definition,
but are not a resident of British Columbia, you will have the opportunity
to "opt in" to one or both of the classes, in a manner that
will be specified later in the proceedings.
What is the Class Action all about - what claims are
being made?
In the class action, the plaintiff seeks to recover judgement
for all of the claims described in the Statement of Claim. Some of the
claims made are:
a claim for a declaration that Freightliner has
breached its obligation to pension benficiaries by withdrawing
surplus funds that belonged to the workers and their families
a claim for a declaration that Freightliner has
breached its obligation to pension benficiaries by failing to
make appropriate contributions to the pension fund over the
years
 a claim for a declaration that Freightliner would
be in breach of its obligations in using pension funds to pay
for the administion costs of the plan, including costs of terminating
the plan
If I accept a severance package from Freightliner,
will this affect my ability to recover in the Pension Class Action?
This depends on the language of any Release you may sign.
It is unlikely that your claim on the pension plan portion of the class
action will be affected if you accept a severance package, unless you
sign a Release which covers your pension. The specific language must
be carefully checked.
I am currently receiving a pension from Freightliner's
pension plan, how am I impacted by this class action?
If you are currently receiving a Freightliner pension,
and you are a BC resident, once the class action is certified, you will
automatically be part of the class action. If you are not a BC resident,
you will have a chance to "opt in" to the class action claim.Your current pension benefits will continue unaffected
by the class action. If we are successful in the action you may become
entitled to a lump sum payment or an increase in your benefits.
Does it cost me anything to take part in the class
action?
No, not at this point. If we are successful in the action,
with the court's approval, a portion of the award that we obtain for
each of the members will go towards our legal fees and disbursements.
If we are unsuccessful in the action, there will be no costs.If I move to another province or out of the country,
can I still take part in the class action?
Yes, you can still take part in the class action if you
move away from British Columbia.
What information and documents should I send to TevlinGleadle?
We will provide a form of questionnaire to be completed
by the class members in due course. This questionnaire will describe
the documents we will need. In the meantime you should organize and
preserve documents relevant to your work history and your pension.
What if I want to "Opt Out" of the Class
Action?
You will have an opportunity to opt out of the class action
once the court has certified the proceedings and approved the classes.
After certification, class members will be able to obtain a form to
be completed by anyone wishing to opt out, by download from this website.
What if I want to "Opt In" to the Class Action?
You will have an opportunity to opt in tothe class action
once the court has certified the proceedings and approved the classes.
After certification, class members will be able to obtain a form to
be completed by anyone wishing to opt in, by download from this website.
How long will it take for the Class Action to be resolved?
The answer to this question depends on circumstances which
cannot be determined with certainty at this stage. Depending on the
nature and extent of discussions between TevlinGleadle, class counsel,
and counsel for the defendants, early resolution of some or all of the
issues might be achieved. Early steps are being taken in the action,
to exchange formal positions (Statement of Claim, Statements of Defence),
and to seek an order certifying the proceeding as a Class Action. The
certification application is required by the Class Proceedings Act to
occur within 90 days of the time when the defendants are supposed to
have filed their Statements of Defence. Worst Case Scenario: If all issues are fully disputed,
and no agreements can be concluded with the defendants, and if all appeals
are taken, final resolution of all claims might not occur for up to
several years. However, we are committing all our resources now, seeking
a fair resolution to all issues at the earliest possible date. |
|
|